Seneca OL-RACK-001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSeneca OL-RACK-001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P7H55-M PRO
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 15:07
Run Duration413 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 140
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 283
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E204) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 88 87 91 92 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 204
Write 196
Mixed 175
SusWrite 87.3
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 22.5
82% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 36.6
32% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 90 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 81.7
Write 83.9
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 90.8
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 56%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 132 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 118
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 132
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 96%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 127 127 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 118
Write 131
Mixed 67
SusWrite 126
150% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OL-RACK-001 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Seneca OL-RACK-001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback