Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory16 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 13:35
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 407
52% 393 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2317 MHz, MLim: 3958 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 132
Parallax 137
117% 137 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 115
Splatting 99.1
98% 123 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 280
Write 202
Mixed 160
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 18
74% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 53.3
DQ Mixed 91.4
85% 138 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
51GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 400 400 358 278 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 398
Mixed 345
SusWrite 334
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 56.1
181% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
36GB free
Firmware: 010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 391 390 208 367 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 398
Write 377
Mixed 361
SusWrite 335
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 51
162% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 296
241% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
15GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 941
Write 676
Mixed 359
145% 659 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 49.4
176% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 547
DQ Mixed 640
498% 691 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
899GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65% Good
Read 111
Write 140
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 115
71% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 65%
Great: 87%
SDXC Card 64GB
60GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 8.9 8.9 9 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Read 4.2
Write 22.9
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 9.6
15% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 41%
Prolific ATAPI-6 Bridge C 3TB
728GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 112 116 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 112
142% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 68%
Prolific ATAPI-6 Bridge C 2TB
169GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 112 116 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48% Average
Read 115
Write 112
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 112
140% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 17.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback