MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 10:42
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 418
52% 398 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4029) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 61
Parallax 52.2
48% 57.2 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 48.8
40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-240 240GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 27 3.8 24 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 401
Write 122
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 14.1
29% 136 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.6
38% 9.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
406GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 181 181 182 185 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 176
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 182
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
316GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 41.4
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback