Asrock N68-S3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 20:48
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 112
49% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 111
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 96.8
6% 96.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120G B 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 5.8 1.8 5.5 75 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.5% Below average
Read 223
Write 176
Mixed 129
SusWrite 44.3
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 7.4
58% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 8.9
19% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
373GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.9 3.9 5.3 59 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 97.7
Write 113
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 34.3
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38%
Great: 70%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
298GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4 3.4 4.9 56 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 104
Write 59.7
Mixed 63
SusWrite 30.8
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 62%
Maxtor 6K040L0 41GB
60GB free
Firmware: NAR61HA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.3 2.6 3.5 42 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 73.9
Write 85.3
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 24.8
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564568FH8N0QHSCR SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S3 FX Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback