Hyrican GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHyrican GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 970A-DS3P
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 19:32
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 131
59% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 381
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1475 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 55.4
0% 34.1 fps
MRender 45.8
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 32.1
32% 40.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 214 214 211 214 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 463
Write 310
Mixed 224
SusWrite 218
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 39.6
119% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 242
187% 256 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 111%
Transcend TS1TSSD220Q 1TB
176GB free
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 50 34 35 38 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 466
Write 409
Mixed 370
SusWrite 99.2
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 24.9
112% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 97.9
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 41.9
67% 123 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Hyrican GA-970A-DS3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback