Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C70D-B (all builds)
Motherboard	FF10 06C2
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150730
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '22 at 18:49
Run Duration	341 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics 19,683 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 40.8 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 5.4 22% 27.3 Pts	4-Core 26.5 8-Core 90.3 6% 58.4 Pts	64-Core 55.8 4% 55.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F938) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 3.5 1% 2.43 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 3.2 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi550 S3 512GB 615 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: U1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 237 304 305 279 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 411 Write 313 Mixed 299 SusWrite 291 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 13.3 56% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 87.3 DQ Mixed 29.6 43% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 930GB free Firmware: AX1P4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 114 113 113 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 105 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 112 63% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 62%
PHILIPS 252GB 93GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 0.6 1.6 11 23 1.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.96% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 6 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 6.4 10% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.4 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TIMETEC-SD3-1600 2x8GB 579 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	10x
A4-6210 APU R3 GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 5,378 samples	9x
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 3,779 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	10x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	9x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	7x

SSD
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	2x
MX300 525GBCrucial $150Bench 86%, 105,037 samples	1x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	6x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	6x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16