Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 16:18
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 110
55% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 294
29% 239 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.40.14
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48% Average
Lighting 62
Reflection 70
Parallax 84.3
50% 72.1 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 43.7
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 120GB-$130
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 26 26 27 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 101%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
100GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 155 143 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65% Good
Read 337
Write 281
Mixed 244
SusWrite 166
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 32.5
110% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 111
96% 142 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65%
Great: 108%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 128
Write 118
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 100
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 83%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB
523GB free, PID 0810
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 26.5
Mixed 22
SusWrite 26.8
35% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback