TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10ST000CAU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10ST000CAU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 312A
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190711
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 10:08
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 637
70% 550 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 84.3%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 8D92)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.1% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 45.5
43% 50.3 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 42
35% 42.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 40.1%
 Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,072
Write 1,824
Mixed 939
357% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 11.5
112% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 1,004
720% 921 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 370%
Samsung 970 Evo 250GB
124GB free
Firmware: 0207
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 39.2
9% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 14.5
48% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 17.5
13% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 19.7%
 Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston 9905702-136.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.4
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 80.7%
 Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 10ST000CAU Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10ST000CAU

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel  $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples9x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples7x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples3x
SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 182%, 10,890 samples6x
MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 192%, 3,288 samples1x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples1x
RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston 9905702-136.A00G 16GBSamsungBench 74%, 33 samples2x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples2x
HMA82GU6MFR8N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 72%, 553 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback