| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20111214 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 16 '22 at 21:55 |
| Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
| Run User | PER-User |
| Background CPU | 92% |
| CPU Throttled | 50% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
|
30%
Poor
|
25% 33.2 Pts
|
6% 47.2 Pts
|
4% 63.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2875
|
1.73%
Terrible
|
2% 2.33 fps
|
2% 2.53 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team T253X2128G 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 220 227 226 219 215 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
29% 126 MB/s
|
23% 7.57 MB/s
|
50% 96.8 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
5GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
15% 12.5 MB/s
|
10% 0.9 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown AM1U16BC4P2-B19H Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
27.2%
Poor
|
28% 9.97 GB/s
|
16% 5.7 GB/s
|
27% 149 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA Builds (Compare 586 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 166x |
| Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples | 162x |
| Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples | 71x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $253 |