Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration435 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 272
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 928
86% 719 Pts
64-Core 1475
91% 1475 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 168
Parallax 174
140% 171 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 151
Splatting 126
124% 157 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 212 211 215 129 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
Read 330
Write 395
Mixed 229
SusWrite 173
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 12.4
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 92
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 111
85% 113 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 47%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,681
Write 1,914
Mixed 1,860
477% 2,152 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 96.2
321% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 1017
776% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB
300GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,558
Write 2,280
Mixed 1,541
472% 2,127 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 88
295% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1286
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 1,041
797% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 119%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,529
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,525
469% 2,110 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 88.4
294% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 1,017
777% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 494GB
51GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,532
Write 2297
Mixed 1,512
469% 2,114 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 88.7
296% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,277
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 1,040
795% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,527
Write 738
Mixed 1,563
352% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 88.4
296% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,278
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 1042
798% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 130%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 140 144 112 39 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 278
Write 295
Mixed 203
SusWrite 102
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 16.6
58% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 114
88% 119 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 130%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 938GB
874GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 142 111 36 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41% Average
Read 449
Write 351
Mixed 356
SusWrite 100
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 8
37% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 108
89% 127 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 936GB
872GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 138 142 110 36 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.9% Average
Read 450
Write 358
Mixed 356
SusWrite 100
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 14.2
44% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 109
89% 126 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 51%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 990GB
922GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 208 208 212 118 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 318
Write 118
Mixed 210
SusWrite 167
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 9.3
38% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 106
87% 124 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 120%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 215 219 218 219 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 182
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 216
119% 165 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
477% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 122%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback