Lenovo 82AS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82AS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 16:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 252
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 287
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F18) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.4
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ1T0HALB-000L2 1TB
915GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 602 575 815 1071 791 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 936
Mixed 644
SusWrite 725
156% 684 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 61.3
206% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 418
290% 366 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 141%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.7% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82AS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82AS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback