Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '22 at 14:52
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 36.9 2-Core 100 50% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 354 40% 316 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 82F1) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 4 Parallax 0.8 2% 2.3 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 301 301 274 310 311 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 440 Mixed 367 SusWrite 304 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 74.7 4K Mixed 40.4 135% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 325 256% 354 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 122%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 306GB free, PID ab26 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 94 89 91 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 48.8 Write 89.8 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 90.4 101% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 82% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 51%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 0GB free, PID ab26 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 46.6 Write 60.4 Mixed 50.2 70% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 1,169 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.4 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	391x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	206x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $902

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16