Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.8% Poor	Memory 35.1 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 45.3 29% 44.7 Pts	4-Core 70.7 8-Core 91.3 10% 81 Pts	64-Core 46.8 3% 46.8 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Device(2782 1100) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.23.01 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.03 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB 18,166 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 12066712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 40 50 49 56 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 87.1 Write 42.1 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 55.4 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS8266.M8FF 2x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.6% Below average	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 13.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 10.2 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 227 18% 227 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples	6x

GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	6x

RAM
CT4G4SFS8266.M8FG 2x4GBCrucialBench 73%, 49 samples	3x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 59%, 11,378 samples	1x
CT4G4SFS8266.M8FF 2x4GBCrucialBench 70%, 50 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16