Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 127% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220216
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '22 at 00:20
Run Duration	362 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 87.2 1-Core 164 2-Core 326 103% 192 Pts	4-Core 631 8-Core 892 96% 762 Pts	64-Core 1,130 70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 2486) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 165 Parallax 160 137% 164 fps	MRender 177 Gravity 130 Splatting 113 111% 140 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB 10,530 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.7.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,101 Write 1,832 Mixed 617 334% 1,516 MB/s	4K Read 59.9 4K Write 181 4K Mixed 67.8 274% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,301 DQ Write 1,068 DQ Mixed 459 541% 942 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 313%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 114GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 420 411 339 278 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 461 Mixed 405 SusWrite 394 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 58 169% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 221 166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 581GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 157 156 157 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 118 Write 96.3 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 155 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 284GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 139 138 138 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 155 Write 105 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 137 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 887GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 167 167 167 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 157 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 165 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 161 160 162 164 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 171 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 163 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 108%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB 763 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 93GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 26 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 16 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 27.3 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.8 168% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 22%
Samsung SSD 850 250GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 138% 77GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 301 284 219 49 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 378 Write 401 Mixed 347 SusWrite 211 448% 334 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 25.3 1,831% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 26.3 DQ Mixed 25.8 1,868% 26 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 223%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$65 38,251 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 36.7 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 29.6 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 39 91% 31.8 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,145x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $141Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,716x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	915x
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	881x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	700x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	300x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	276x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,484

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16