Medion MD34173/C719

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion MD34173/C719  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 00:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 793
78% 638 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 85.9
Reflection 133
Parallax 165
70% 128 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 88.5
Splatting 150
116% 142 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 623
Write 379
Mixed 429
106% 477 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 49
181% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 179
159% 231 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
148GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 128 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 114
Write 123
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 128
70% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34173/C719 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34173/C719

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback