Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 49.1 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 57 32% 49.7 Pts	4-Core 56.4 8-Core 97.9 9% 77.2 Pts	64-Core 92.5 6% 92.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C06A) 3.5GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 4,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT04L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 105 116 106 109 113 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.7% Below average	Read 165 Write 106 Mixed 110 SusWrite 111 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 13.1 52% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 43.2 60% 113 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 9.7 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.7 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	4x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	2x
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	8x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 4,607 samples	1x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x

RAM
M471B2873FHS-CF8 80CE M471B5773CHS-CF8 3GBUnknownBench 21%, 168 samples	2x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 692 samples	1x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $158