Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 20:42
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 151
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 363
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 8840) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 473.62
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.5% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 100
Parallax 92.3
83% 98 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 93.3
Splatting 79.1
73% 91.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500G 500GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 235 226 237 237 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
79.1% Very good
Read 246
Write 236
Mixed 234
SusWrite 220
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 45.6
150% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 121%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
440GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 83 83 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 79
Write 80
Mixed 51
SusWrite 81.3
98% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback