Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-UP4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88X-UP4  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 20:11
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 131
54% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 202
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
EVGA(3842 2069) 2GB
CLim: 865 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.2
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M128C 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 365
Mixed 357
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 0.1
83% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 0.1
38% 85 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 96%
Toshiba MK1655GSX 160GB-$40
67GB free
Firmware: FG011M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 47 47 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 43.9
Write 40
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 45.9
28% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0N Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C Kingston HP497157-D01- 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.9% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88X-UP4 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-UP4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback