Lenovo 82FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82FX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 11:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 163
2-Core 284
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 334
59% 413 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX450
Legend(17AA 3F19) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 39
33% 41.4 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 35.7
30% 36 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1101 1TB
646GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 739 767 829 910 857 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1883
Write 1,471
Mixed 1,319
SusWrite 833
308% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 65.9
224% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 971
679% 872 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 232%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D2NP-046 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 57.8
MC Mixed 37.3
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 16.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 113%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82FX Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback