MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C34
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34)  (all builds)
Memory122.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 18:39
Run Duration430 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 78.9
79% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 79% Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
MSI(1462 3817) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.8.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 150
Parallax 194
104% 157 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 144
Splatting 98.7
98% 122 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 466 458 468 468 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 459
Mixed 432
SusWrite 462
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 50.3
168% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 198
146% 192 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
953GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2141 2186 2176 2180 1972 2027 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,534
Write 2,190
Mixed 246
SusWrite 2,114
395% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 91.2
312% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,318
DQ Write 1,103
DQ Mixed 389
515% 936 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 381%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$130
653GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1827 1821 1560 1449 1543 1549 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 2,553
Write 1,698
Mixed 1,700
SusWrite 1625
424% 1,894 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 88.9
303% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,675
DQ Write 1,177
DQ Mixed 1,037
880% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 359%
Great: 372%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
954GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1587 1943 2022 2106 2117 2025 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,598
Write 2,301
Mixed 246
SusWrite 1,966
396% 1,778 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 94.1
321% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,317
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 358
493% 908 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 376%
Great: 372%
T-force TM8FP8002T 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: V9002s65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 750 786 780 776 779 784 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,849
Write 764
Mixed 835
SusWrite 776
234% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 47.4
178% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 267
226% 317 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 191%
Great: 274%
T-force TM8FP8002T 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V9002s65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1144 1179 1174 1168 1164 1173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,914
Write 1,140
Mixed 952
SusWrite 1167
288% 1,294 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 50.4
195% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 392
338% 482 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 231%
Great: 274%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
931GB free
Firmware: AX1P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 103 102 104 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 94.1
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 102
60% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 62%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$57
564GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 126 125 126 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 99.8
Write 120
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 125
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZR 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 38.1
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 39.7
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) Builds (Compare 449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,675
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback