Lenovo 81Y4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81Y4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 16:55
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 614
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FA3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.5% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 58.1
49% 61.9 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 53.4
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,398
Write 582
Mixed 1,470
255% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 34.9
112% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,162
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 983
719% 950 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
495GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,406
Write 2299
Mixed 2,208
515% 2,304 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 84.7
276% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1157
DQ Write 886
DQ Mixed 1,010
758% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 26
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81Y4 Builds (Compare 6,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81Y4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback