Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Extreme  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 22 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111003
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 09:58
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 144
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 381
41% 328 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 65.3
58% 69 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 64.8
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 71 60 38 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 116
Write 120
Mixed 140
SusWrite 56.8
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 23.2
89% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 32.3
32% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38%
Great: 73%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
172GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 71 60 38 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 216
Write 185
Mixed 75
SusWrite 57.9
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 10.1
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 16.3
12% 17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 58%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
505GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 90 101 159 108 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 221
Write 193
Mixed 120
SusWrite 115
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 10.4
44% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 16.1
12% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 58%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
141GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 69.5
Write 66.8
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 69.7
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
210GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 141 142 142 141 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 95.8
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 139
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 112%
USB Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.6 4.2 4.5 5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Read 11
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.5
6% 5.12 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 22GB
null MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback