Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FAC
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 09:48
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 88.8
46% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 138
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1DE1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.1
2% 3.9 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 354 344 344 336 342 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,032
Write 589
Mixed 485
SusWrite 362
137% 617 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 38.4
161% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 266
199% 267 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 124%
Great: 153%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
785GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 108 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 126
Write 106
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 109
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
218% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2800, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback