Lenovo 20378

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20378  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141110
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 06:49
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 104
54% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 166
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Legend(17AA 3978) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8165
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17
Parallax 19.3
17% 19 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 15.2
16% 20 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 398 414 414 396 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 437
Mixed 383
SusWrite 398
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 46.2
152% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 111
150% 275 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 16.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20378 Builds (Compare 2,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback