Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 119 2-Core 202 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 294 39% 292 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 5079) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 6.7 5% 5.17 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD easystore 240GB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: EF430400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 95 137 132 129 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 396 Write 323 Mixed 266 SusWrite 134 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 5 35% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 75.5 DQ Mixed 36.1 43% 77 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M4S08S681JGGG39-12 1x8GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 11.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	14x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	14x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	1x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	1x

RAM
M4S16S682LJJJ43-12 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 93 samples	3x
9905711-038.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 34%, 74 samples	2x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16