Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Samsung 300E5M/300E5L (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5M-XD1BR
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181123
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '22 at 23:35
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	85%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 129 55% 91.9 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 262 35% 262 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia 920MX 8,308 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sanyo(144D C784) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3063 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	5.76% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 6.6 6% 7.7 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 7.9 6% 7 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.76% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB 18,978 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 445GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8J41100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1298 1020 1153 1096 941 1196 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,056 Write 1,026 Mixed 1,037 SusWrite 1,117 239% 1,059 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 34.6 174% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 751 DQ Write 492 DQ Mixed 594 451% 613 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 246%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 437GB free Firmware: AX1R4F SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 74 73 65 83 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 85.8 Mixed 8 SusWrite 72.9 40% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 029E CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.3% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 22.6 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 17.5 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5M/300E5L Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	189x
Core i3-6006UIntelBench 36%, 47,111 samples	103x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	95x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	219x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	105x
920MXNvidiaBench 6%, 8,308 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	22x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	8x

RAM
SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,421 samples	143x
SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 1x4GBUnknownBench 35%, 1,004 samples	80x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16