Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 36.5 2-Core 73 40% 60.1 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 146 19% 145 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Realtek_sata 128GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R3G40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 193 192 192 122 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.6% Average	Read 217 Write 191 Mixed 165 SusWrite 180 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 24.3 84% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 58.5 DQ Mixed 32.3 28% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 73%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 24GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.6 1.2 2.4 3.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	7.89% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 6.8 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 2.3 9% 8.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.9 116% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.89% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	618x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16