Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 523
58% 459 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 71%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.2 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 9.8
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 518 537 500 406 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,015
Write 457
Mixed 605
SusWrite 473
142% 638 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 43.1
139% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 756
552% 732 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 145%
Great: 309%
XSJ-X100-480G 480GB
57GB free
Firmware: T0430A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 52 34 40 38 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 370
Write 142
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 38.7
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 9.6
53% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 1
31% 77 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
478GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 129 130 130 123 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 173
Write 151
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 125
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback