Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemGigabyte AX370M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 15:32
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 221
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 817
74% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 89.5
54% 73.1 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 47.5
47% 59.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN10SM19EG256GP3X4IT 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 217 258 688 695 470 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,515
Write 69
Mixed 577
SusWrite 427
141% 647 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 27.5
134% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 111
181% 365 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 148%
Great: 200%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
24GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 60 131 51 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 139
Mixed 174
SusWrite 134
51% 234 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 53.7
181% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 100%
Great: 128%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 226 236 236 235 238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 104
Write 205
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 232
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 3.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
225GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 13.3
Write 34.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 82.1
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4S8GL30A8TS5 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 13.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $372
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback