HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '22 at 12:54
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 132 2-Core 258 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 740 72% 594 Pts	64-Core 877 54% 877 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51% Above average	Lighting 62.6 Reflection 64.1 Parallax 59.3 51% 62 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 63.2 Splatting 58 51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 17,082 User benchmarks, average bench 256% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: P4CR313 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 775 Write 679 Mixed 924 178% 793 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 45.7 147% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 666 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 362 291% 422 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 332%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 168 Write 16.2 Mixed 50.4 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 99.5 Write 11.9 Mixed 37.7 37% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
Jmicron Tech 256GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 122GB free Firmware: 0209 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 27.2 Write 3 Mixed 7.7 9% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 4.6 960% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 58%
WDC WD75 00AACS-00ZJB0 750GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 559GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 34 Write 5.5 Mixed 14.2 18% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 30%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 57GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 35.5 Write 5.2 Mixed 13.2 18% 18 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 55% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 64%
ST950042 0AS 500GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 431GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 35.9 Write 6.2 Mixed 14.4 19% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 29%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB 3,948 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 27GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.2 Write 1 Mixed 2.7 6% 7.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 34% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 28GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 14.2 Write 6.7 Mixed 10.2 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 21%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 29GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3 3.4 3.9 3.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	6.38% Terrible	Read 26.6 Write 3 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 4.1 14% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.8 48% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.38% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GB 4,169 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 15.1 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,401x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,029x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	720x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,339x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	837x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	719x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,409x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,234x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	300x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,909x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	783x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	456x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16