Asus K52Je

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus K52Je  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52Je
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 11:15
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 113
49% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 149
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Asus(1043 1BF2) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 138 141 137 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.7% Average
Read 199
Write 188
Mixed 169
SusWrite 140
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 19
65% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 154
117% 158 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EAEEF 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52Je Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52Je

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback