Smbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemSmbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName  (all builds)
MotherboardSmbiosType2_BoardManufacturer SmbiosType2_BoardProductName
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 10:38
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 73
2-Core 145
52% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 268
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.6
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 10.9
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zxfz M.2 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 103 71 68 70 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66% Good
Read 360
Write 251
Mixed 268
SusWrite 97.4
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 26.8
112% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 183
161% 239 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SmbiosType1_SystemProductName Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Smbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback