Oneplus 6T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemOneplus 6T  (all builds)
MotherboardOneplus 6T
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1080 x 2340 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 09:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 845
BGA-1156, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 33.8
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 43.5
22% 33.9 Pts
4-Core 83.3
8-Core 108
12% 95.4 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KLUEG8U1EA-B0C1 253GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 199 205 195 206 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
Read 370
Write 195
Mixed 218
SusWrite 201
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 16.9
59% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 127
95% 126 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BANK 0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback