Lenovo 11JAS0BQ00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemLenovo 11JAS0BQ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 318E
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 16:23
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 50.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 272
80% 155 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 820
78% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 318E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.30.04
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 28.8
13% 19.5 fps
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 20.5
19% 21.2 fps
Poor: 8% Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256-Q79 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6Q279
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1263
Write 73
Mixed 270
114% 535 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 42.5
133% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 273
269% 452 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 230%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
70GB free
Firmware: 1306
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.7
Write 60.5
Mixed 39.6
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
90GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.9
Write 9.5
Mixed 13.2
16% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
382GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7
Write 8.2
Mixed 7.2
10% 7.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4U320038G22-B 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11JAS0BQ00 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 11JAS0BQ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback