HP p6535a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6535a  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 11:49
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 661-$80
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 145
58% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 205
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 2A9C) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160312CS 160GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 55 49 49 62 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 50.3
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 52.8
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905403-011.A03LF AD80AD80 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 0707FE02 GU512303EP0202 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 11
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6535a Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p6535a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback