HP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89ED
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 06:14
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 158
2-Core 310
91% 176 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 720
77% 612 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 89ED) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.60.01
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 15
Parallax 26.5
15% 19.8 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 20.2
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX013N 256GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1861 604 449 423 442 428 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,306
Write 1,957
Mixed 1,491
SusWrite 701
360% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 69.5
232% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,081
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 1,006
752% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 252%
Great: 254%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
109GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 29 39 37 39 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 176
Write 78.1
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 42.7
101% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.5
141% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback