Acer Extensa 3000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAcer Extensa 3000  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Extensa 3000
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20040707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 04:04
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.50GHz
uFCPGA2, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 57
1-Core 10.2
2-Core 11.9
23% 26.4 Pts
4-Core 12.7
8-Core 12.8
2% 12.8 Pts
64-Core 14.3
1% 14.3 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS424040M9AT00 40GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MA2OA60V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 19
Write 19.2
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 17.5
13% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SRAM
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.21% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.2
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.21%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback