Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 22:33
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 67.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 249
76% 143 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 911
86% 711 Pts
64-Core 1,243
77% 1,243 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1629) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.6% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 108
Parallax 124
101% 118 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 113
Splatting 95.2
91% 114 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HS-SSD-E3000 1TB
672GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09139
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2374 2292 2296 1935 1285 1263 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,294
Write 2,256
Mixed 2,081
SusWrite 1,908
481% 2,135 MB/s
4K Read 71.8
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 103
360% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1756
DQ Write 1,302
DQ Mixed 984
884% 1,348 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 388%
Great: 361%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 486 486 486 486 486 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 484
Mixed 424
SusWrite 486
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 44.7
165% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 339
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
124GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 62 62 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 63.7
Write 65.3
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 61.7
78% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2A2666C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 18.1
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback