PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C31 |
Motherboard | MSI B365M PRO-VH (MS-7C31) (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190402 |
Uptime | 11.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 10 '22 at 21:45 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
75.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S6OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 310 220 221 221 219 MB/s
|
95%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
94GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 99 102 113 MB/s
|
61.3%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5702-084.A00G 9905702-119.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
68%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,492x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 534x |
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 167x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 291x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 280x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 214x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $436 |