Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 17:26
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 36.6
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 121
42% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 296
33% 261 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 17C1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.20.36.04
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 3.9
2% 10.2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bc511 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11001101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 309 309 315 324 348 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 800
Write 559
Mixed 658
SusWrite 349
132% 591 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 47.2
164% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 496
370% 495 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 126%
Great: 177%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 128 127 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 81.8
Write 125
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 126
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 21.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback