HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '22 at 16:10
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 162 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 416 45% 358 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.4% Above average	Lighting 73.8 Reflection 74.9 Parallax 69.4 60% 72.7 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 73.3 Splatting 68.9 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 107 104 91 94 69 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.7% Average	Read 196 Write 121 Mixed 155 SusWrite 97 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 21 71% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 150 108% 137 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 80%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 23GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 130 130 130 127 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.5% Average	Read 203 Write 132 Mixed 120 SusWrite 129 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 16.3 71% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 46 65% 123 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 238GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 154 182 183 179 183 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 6 Write 68.4 Mixed 29.4 SusWrite 176 51% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF 50GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 12 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	536x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	489x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16