Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 15:16
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 212
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 350
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 16.6
10% 13 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 11.2
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen09sm21ar256sdkm2 256GB 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 75 49 30 89 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 494
Write 398
Mixed 378
SusWrite 102
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 25.6
108% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 52.8
74% 134 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 132
Write 139
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 116
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
242% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Adata AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback