MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 23:32
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 133
56% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 61.2
8-Core 102
10% 81.6 Pts
64-Core 97.6
6% 97.6 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 03CA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 87 97 71 91 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 206
Write 107
Mixed 161
SusWrite 90.4
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 18.1
65% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 120
94% 127 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 73%
WD WD800BJKT-75F4T0 80GB
4GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 39 27 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 41.9
Write 42.8
Mixed 37
SusWrite 24.1
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.3 8.9 8.6 8.8 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 8
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 8.4
14% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 18%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 60GB
55GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 37 35 34 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 37.2
Write 34
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 35.5
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 6.6
797% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.1
DQ Write 24.3
DQ Mixed 8.1
1,147% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.6% Above average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback