Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMonster MARKUT M7 V5.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER MARKUT M7 V5.1
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 10:57
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 70.2
1-Core 174
2-Core 338
101% 194 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,028
101% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,385
86% 1,385 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 1305) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 11.7
8% 12.9 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
661GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2999 1921 1936 1916 1934 1956 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 876
Write 3,387
Mixed 2,835
SusWrite 2,110
529% 2302 MB/s
4K Read 83.5
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 120
394% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,634
DQ Write 1,213
DQ Mixed 1,345
1,027% 1,398 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 350%
Great: 444%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
382GB free
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2406 2422 2030 1641 1624 1626 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
401% Outstanding
Read 2,562
Write 2,269
Mixed 2,339
SusWrite 1,958
514% 2,282 MB/s
4K Read 75.1
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 107
352% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,775
DQ Write 1,336
DQ Mixed 1,503
1,138% 1,538 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 401%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 33.6
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 44.9
SC Mixed 19.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MARKUT M7 V5.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback