HP Laptop 17-by4xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 17-by4xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 881B
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 06:37
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 237
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 360
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 881B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 16.5
10% 15.3 fps
MRender 18.5
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 14.8
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG40ZNV256G KIOXIA 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 840 384 390 399 397 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,448
Write 1,403
Mixed 1252
SusWrite 562
262% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 81.9
293% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,321
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 702
618% 939 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 230%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-043.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 21.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 18.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-by4xxx Builds (Compare 595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-by4xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback