Gigabyte GA-Z390 M GAMING-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 M GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 M GAMING-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 284
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 810
87% 690 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 674 474 262 361 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,962
Write 1,644
Mixed 134
SusWrite 424
229% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 74.1
246% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 513
531% 881 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 228%
Great: 318%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
171GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 176 75 67 110 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 485
Write 415
Mixed 406
SusWrite 162
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 29.8
136% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 49.4
96% 191 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FE 859B BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FB 859B BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FE 859B BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FB 16GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 28.9
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 M GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 3,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 M GAMING-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $553
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback