HP Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1493
Memory4.3 GB free of 6.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 62.2
37% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 93.1
8-Core 92.9
12% 93 Pts
64-Core 75.3
5% 75.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel B43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 1493)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250310CS 250GB-$33
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ACD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 92 81 79 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 26
Write 35.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 87.2
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 AXIOM MEMORY ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback