Asrock B550 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 166
2-Core 291
102% 183 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 918
86% 716 Pts
64-Core 1206
75% 1206 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
ASRock(1849 5204) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 173
Parallax 365
145% 238 fps
MRender 294
Gravity 129
Splatting 193
165% 205 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 949 934 889 750 874 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,548
Write 2,046
Mixed 1,709
SusWrite 865
348% 1,542 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 85.8
304% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,594
DQ Write 1,244
DQ Mixed 642
692% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 272%
Great: 286%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 150 151 151 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 155
Write 145
Mixed 110
SusWrite 150
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1.1
20% 7.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 2.1
3% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 37.4
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,040
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback