Google Guado

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemGoogle Guado  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Guado
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 16:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
CPU0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 95
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 245
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Intel(8086 1616) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.9
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY PRO ELITE 500GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS206613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 375 81 78 77 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 426
Write 321
Mixed 328
SusWrite 175
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 30.4
131% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 185
168% 252 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G3S160BM.M16FP CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 18.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 30 84.6" 1280 701 SAM0DF6 SAMSUNG
Typical Guado Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Google Guado

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback