Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409JB
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 09:35
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 243
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 559
64% 498 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 180F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 8.6
6% 9.03 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 8
Splatting 12.9
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta R900 M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RI25V0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1208 1237 1226 1218 1147 1136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,569
Write 873
Mixed 839
SusWrite 1,195
250% 1,119 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 29
216% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 526
493% 758 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 236%
Great: 269%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 122 130 131 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 125
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 0A94 D4M4GS24A16 8GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20.1
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 19.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback